We’d love to hear from you!


* fields are required



Thank You!

Your message has been sent and we will
get back to you as soon as possible.

Return to Email Form
919.821.2921 509 W. North Street, Raleigh, NC 27603

Thank you for contacting us.

Your message has been received, we love starting new conversations. In fact, that's what we do best. We will contact you very shortly about how Centerline can help you get your message out.

When American Airlines revealed their first brand refresh in 45 years, a lively debate followed. Some people loved the new look while others thought it sacrilege to change a classic logo by a legendary designer.


I was talking to fellow Centerliner, Cait Smith, about the rebrand, and we had an interesting discussion about logo design, the essence of a brand and what rebranding means to customers. A transcript of our conversation via G-Chat is below. But we want to hear from you: What do you think of the AA rebrand?

Cait: Hey hey. What do you think of the AA rebrand?

Ben: I liked it right away. Usually I have to let these things sink in a little first, but with this, my gut reaction was that it was beautiful. It was so many things boiled down to one symbol: an eagle, a wing, the letter “A”. I thought it was very well done. What did you think?

Cait: My initial reaction was questioning why they chose to rebrand now, right as they’re moving out of bankruptcy. There are a lot of hypotheses (mergers, etc.), but I hope it’s a good sign, and that perhaps the outward facelift signals a massive internal one, where they improve and invest in things like better customer service and pricing. The new look took me a second to get used to, but I think that’s normal. I dig the eagle facing straight ahead (and not down in the I’m-gonna-eat-the-eyes-out-of-your-head stance).

Ben: Yeah, I wasn’t a fan of the old eagle. And I read somewhere that Massimo Vignelli (the designer of the old logo) didn’t even design the eagle. It was added after he was finished by another agency. I also read, and I found this interesting, this rebrand could be seen as a historical shift in America’s place of power in the world. The old logo was designed in the 60′s when the U.S. was more powerful. The aggressive eagle reflects that. American wanted to rebrand with “the new, friendlier face” of America. That historic aspect brings another level of complexity to it for me. I wasn’t aware of the business aspects you mentioned. But knowing that now, it does seem like strange timing.

Cait: I love the notion of America rebranding with a new, friendlier face.

Ben: Yeah me too.

Cait: There have been some comments from people who have said that the friendlier eagle is a sign that America is in a negative position of power, but I think looking more like a collaborator than a bully is always a good thing

Ben: What did you think of the immediate criticism from some people? Or praise?

Cait: I think rebrands always ignite heated commentary. Some productive, some not. But in the case of an airline rebrand, people feel especially heated because they’ve had a slew of first-hand, negative experiences. Those negative experiences impact our lives greatly, like being stuck in an airport or paying insane fees. And there’s slim pickings to go elsewhere. We still have to fly with them at some point. It’s not like shopping for a shirt, where you can go almost anywhere.

So a rebrand may seem like a slap in the face because AA is investing in something that seems intangible to the end customer. I think that’s where a lot of the backlash came from. That, and the way employees were laid off and lost their pensions. So no matter what the design actually looked like, I think we’d see the same reaction: customers thinking the brand isn’t invested in humans…that AA is more concerned about what they look like in the mirror.

Ben: It’s interesting you mentioned buying shirts. Remember when Gap tried to rebrand?

Cait: Now THAT was some upheaval.

Ben: I think the backlash they got was deserved in that case. What a horrible logo. I’m glad they ditched it. But there are instances where people pounce on rebrands on twitter, or through a blog or whatever just to sound like a trend setter, like when Pepsi came out with their new logo. The old one was an icon, but I really like the new one. It has the memory of the old logo, but it’s forward looking.. plus it looks like “P”. It’s a good logo. I can only speculate on people’s motivation, but I think a lot of criticism sounds like a game of one-upmanship.

Cait: Yeah, when people freak out about a soda rebrand, they need to chill (get it!?). Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, but some are flat-out rude about it. It’s not like Pepsi was changing their recipe.

Ben: It’s not like they were doing something really bad like re-releasing Crystal Pepsi. But getting back to AA, do you think it will stop anyone from flying with them? Even if they know the background with the layoffs and everything? Or are people just looking for the cheapest ticket?

Cait: No, I don’t think people will stop flying with AA because of a rebrand. They’ll stop flying with them because of customer service, comfort and price.

Ben: Yeah, I agree. I don’t think anyone will make a conscious decision based on a logo or brand design. I guess the bigger question is: Will they make an unconscious decision to buy a ticket because they like the brand, not because they don’t like it?

Cait: That would be interesting to test! What do you think is the hardest part of designing logos?

Ben: I think the hardest part for me is taking everything about a company – sometimes we’re talking about a corporate culture of thousands of people – and boiling it down to a small, easily digestible, memorable image. You have to convey so much information in something that might only be seen for a second. It’s a big challenge. I think that’s why I like this AA logo so much. It’s a simple image, but it says a lot.

Cait: Hopefully that simplicity and “friendliness” of the new AA logo is reflected in the customer experience as AA rolls out of the red.  If so, even those critics who said, “Eww the tail looks like a bathing suit!” will suddenly love everything about it.

Ben: I forgot about the tail. It didn’t look as good as the logo for sure, but I’ll wait to see it on an actual plane to make a judgment. I like the slivery paint they’re going to be using. Hope it doesn’t blind people.

Cait: Yeah that would be a big downer. You hear about the Korean Air Line rebrand?

Ben: No?

Cait: There were a bunch of plane crashes. Then one was shot down by accident (horrible). So they rebranded, which was good because the past wasn’t pretty. With AA coming out of bankruptcy, perhaps they thought the same thing: keep the past in the past and focus on a more promising future.

Ben: So it’s like a facelift, right? AA totally got “Demi Moored.”

Cait: haha. Oh man, now I want to do some pottery.

Ben: haha

Cait: But alone. Not with a dead guy.


Maybe you, too, followed the lively online debate when American Airlines first revealed their new look. As content creators and designers who support large brands, we believe there is no “right” or “wrong” opinion, just different ways to interpret what a brand is attempting to communicate. It’s a fun creative and strategic exercise to figure out the “why” behind a rebrand, and then observe and research how others reacted. Not so we design based on the public opinion, but so we’re expanding our own thinking and opening ourselves up to new perspectives.

We want to hear your perspective. What do you think of the AA rebrand and the reaction that followed? What’s your first reaction when any well-recognized brand goes through such a dramatic change? 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. I heard a story on PBS’ Marketplace on the proposed merger with US Air, and the thesis was, if the merger goes through, the new company will keep the AA brand and drop US Air. If that’s the case the timing for the rebrand makes sense — but the deal isn’t done so there’s definitely risk.

  2. Ben Harris

    Thanks for the comment Frank. It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out. To be honest, I didn’t know anything about the merger when I first saw the logo.

    And thanks for sharing the post. What do you think of the rebrand?

  1. New on the @centerline blog: @caitvsmith and I talk about the AA #rebrand and ghosts. Please add to the conversation: http://t.co/eXiiLwf3

  2. Takes on the #AA #rebrand from 2 @centerline coworkers. Interesting comments re: portrayal of power in the new logo. http://t.co/EwdcSP6P

  3. Had a great convo with colleage @bentist about the AA rebrand. Join in! | Rebranding: More Than A Logo http://t.co/pVkYGGhU #brandidentity

  4. RT @bentist: New on the @centerline blog: @caitvsmith and I talk about the AA #rebrand and ghosts. Please add to the conversation: http://t.co/eXiiLwf3

  5. RT @johnvlane: a conversation about American Airlines new brand. why do these changes affect us so much? http://t.co/809m8Eoa #brandidentity

  6. RT @johnvlane: A conversation about American Airlines new brand. Why do these changes affect us so much? http://t.co/Onb1mEat #brandidentity

  7. More Than A Logo: Why We Care About Rebrands http://t.co/L5fcBpNR @CenterLine


Blog | 12/01/2008

Is Pepsi Worth the Change?

by John Lane

Is Pepsi Worth the Change?

Read Post

Blog | 07/02/2012

July Three for All: Ideas, Trends, and Inspiration

by Mike Delaney

July Three for All: Ideas, Trends, and Inspiration

Read Post

Blog | 01/21/2008

Brand Loyalty.

by Jeremy Hogan

Brand Loyalty.

Read Post

Blog | 11/27/2012


by Cait Vlastakis Smith

Why "Overthinking" is a Commodity for Designers

Read Post

Blog | 01/05/2010

Social Media Illusions

by John Lane

Social Media Illusions

Read Post

Blog | 02/08/2008

A Brief History of Tech Logos

by Michael Brooks

A Brief History of Tech Logos

Read Post

Blog | 02/28/2012

The Centerline Story Multiplier

by Allan Maule

The Centerline Story Multiplier

Read Post

Blog | 09/08/2014

8 Takeaways from Hopscotch Design Festival

by Christie Montague

8 Takeaways from Hopscotch Design Festival

Read Post

Blog | 01/15/2008

Just A Logo?

by Michael Brooks

Just A Logo?

Read Post

Blog | 08/02/2011

What the Fiat 500 Can Teach Us About The Power of Design

by Ben Harris

What the Fiat 500 Can Teach Us About The Power of Design

Read Post
Scroll To Top

509 W. North Street
Raleigh, NC 27603


© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Corporate Responsibility