We’d love to hear from you!

CLOSE

* fields are required

-

-

Thank You!


Your message has been sent and we will
get back to you as soon as possible.

Return to Email Form
919.821.2921 509 W. North Street, Raleigh, NC 27603

Thank you for contacting us.

Your message has been received, we love starting new conversations. In fact, that's what we do best. We will contact you very shortly about how Centerline can help you get your message out.

Ever heard some version of the following?

“Did you know Apple never did any user research?! And, we all love our iWhatevers…ergo, user research is bogus!”

To the best of my evidence-surfacing abilities, I’ve never been able to find a direct quote from Steve Jobs or Apple completely denouncing user research. Yet it seems that the above sentiment is a fairly common one.

Maybe people are under the impression that Apple is anti-research because of Jobs’ candidness in talking about why he didn’t take product development direction from users:

“Customers can’t anticipate what the technology can do. They won’t ask for things that they think are impossible. But the technology may be ahead of them. If you happen to mention something, they’ll say, ‘Of course, I’ll take that. Do you mean I can have that, too?’ It sounds logical to ask customers what they want and then give it to them. But they rarely wind up getting what they really want that way.”

In other words: Users don’t know what they want.

Phillip Schiller (Apple’s SVP of Worldwide Marketing) echoed Jobs’ opinion in his testimonial during the Apple vs. Samsung trial:

“We don’t use any customer surveys, focus groups, or typical things of that nature. That plays no role in the creation of the products.”

Again, I’ll take this as: Users don’t know what they want.

Jobs wanted (and Apple wants) to create great products. But Jobs didn’t believe true innovation would come from sitting in a room with a few users bribed with fifty bucks and some diet coke and asking them, “Hey, what do you want me to do next?”

Neither do I. That’s not what I mean when I talk about conducting “user research.” What I do mean by “user research”—and what I believe to be a vital part the design process—is surfacing needs. And you do that through direct contact with the people who actually use your stuff, through empathy, and by understanding who those users are—not by asking them what they want.

Henry Ford is famously quoted as saying, ‘If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have told me faster horses.” Tom Webster’s reply to this commonly quoted argument in his recent post rings true to the value of surfacing needs over simply asking users what they want:

“I can assure you that if a competent practitioner in my field asked Ford’s customers what they wanted, the answer would have been ‘to get places faster.’”

It’s not our job as user researchers to ask people what they want and then go off and create what they’ve asked for. It’s our job to identify the needs behind those desires ourselves, as—and even before—they exist, and then fill them. First-hand contact with users is the most powerful way to identify those gaps.

William Gribbons articulates the greater picture perfectly in words that I wish were my own:

“We must be guided by a focus on real and unmet human need. We cannot expect users to explicitly define this need, but through our close contact with them, we have a front-row vantage point for identifying opportunities.”

Talking to users to learn about what makes them tick—what motivates them, what kind of goals they have, what factors affect and persuade them—allows us to design products and experiences that will delight people and compel them to act.

Observing users with existing products and prototypes—witnessing behaviors firsthand—allows us to understand frustrations and reactions better than drawing our own conclusions out of context.

So, yes, users may not know what they want. But that doesn’t mean users aren’t worth talking to. Direct contact with the people you’re designing for is the best lens for identifying opportunities to create great products and experiences, and in turn, long-lasting relationships with customers.


Share:

Tags:

,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Tweets
Comments
  1. The insightful and candid @kateawilliamson on Why Users Don’t Know What They Want (and how designers can help):
    http://t.co/uGoWG9A2Ws

  2. Innovation doesn’t come from sitting with a few users bribed with fifty bucks and some diet coke: http://t.co/HsgdFJ4lvr #UserResearch #UX

  3. RT @caitvsmith: I’m about to bear hug this blog post. | Users Don’t Know What They Want (Talk to Them Anyway). http://t.co/4xCGVLxrIM #ux #userresearch

  4. RT @johnvlane: “It’s our job to identify the needs behind desires ourselves, as—or even before—they exist & fill them.” http://t.co/migGUe33a8 #mrx

  5. Implications of wants vs needs in user research via @CenterLine & @kateawilliamson http://t.co/4FCPvPJCRg

  6. Insightful words from @kateawilliamson User Research: Users don’t know what they want http://t.co/hAMzyrvnNm

  7. RT @kateawilliamson: Users don’t know what they want. Talk to them anyway. #UserResearch = surfacing needs, not taking orders. http://t.co/pFa0HNpn7S #ux

  8. user research isn’t abt asking what people want; it’s abt uncovering desire for what they don’t know they need yet. http://t.co/migGUe33a8

RELATED CONTENT: ,

Blog | 03/21/2014

Mastering Simplicity

by Geoff Mackey

Mastering Simplicity

Read Post

Blog | 05/09/2013

UX vs. UI: What's the Difference?

by Kate Williamson

UX vs. UI: What's the Difference?

Read Post

Blog | 05/14/2012

Put Your UX Where Your Mouth Is (Honest UX, Part I)

by Kate Williamson

Put Your UX Where Your Mouth Is (Honest UX, Part I)

Read Post

Blog | 05/16/2012

Honest UX Speaks for Itself (Honest UX, Part II)

by Kate Williamson

Honest UX Speaks for Itself (Honest UX, Part II)

Read Post

Blog | 04/11/2013

Information Architecture Requires Research, Data & Empathy

by Cait Vlastakis Smith

Information Architecture Requires Research, Data & Empathy

Read Post

Blog | 08/28/2012

The Expiration Date on Authenticity

by Cait Vlastakis Smith

The Expiration Date on Authenticity

Read Post

Blog | 05/31/2012

Mind Your Signals: Context Speaks Louder Than Words

by Cait Vlastakis Smith

Mind Your Signals: Context Speaks Louder Than Words

Read Post

Blog | 02/05/2014

Anticipation: The Often Unopened Window of Opportunity in User Experience

by Geoff Mackey

Anticipation: The Often Unopened Window of Opportunity in User Experience

Read Post

Blog | 03/04/2014

Going From

by John Roberts

Going From "Cool" to Useful

Read Post

Blog | 04/22/2014

The Future of User Experience, Part One: The Past of User Experience

by Geoff Mackey

The Future of User Experience, Part One: The Past of User Experience

Read Post
Scroll To Top

509 W. North Street
Raleigh, NC 27603


919.821.2921

© COPYRIGHT 2014. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Corporate Responsibility